Liopleurodon

Product Information

Although the Liopleurodon was a giant animal, it was not as big as the Australian giant Kronosaurus, which had a maximum length of 36 feet. The study of Liopleurodon is a means to understand the marine ecosystem of the Jurassic period precisely and the Mesozoic Era as a whole. FAQs Was Liopleurodon Bigger than Mosasaurus?

This brawl is one of the reasons scientists believe that most youngsters did not make it to adulthood. It is easy to guess that these species competed with Liopleurodon for food, although they were also likely prey to this creature because of its huge size and position on the food chain. I agree with McHenry that the reconstruction may have been based on the ‘Stewartby Pliosaur’ supplemented with information from other pliosaurs, possibly the lectotype of ‘ Stretosaurus’. But it is misleading to call the reconstruction ‘ Stretosaurus‘, especially since significant portions of the Newman & Tarlo reconstruction are implicitly based on Liopleurodon ferox (The ‘Stewartby Pliosaur’). To my eye the hind limb in the reconstruction does resemble the ‘Stewartby Pliosaur’ (from what is visible in the photograph) more than the ‘Stretham Pliosaur’. A PLIOSAUR ( LIOPLEURODON)After birth, baby Liopleurodon likely stayed with their mothers until they were mature enough to care for themselves.

Beyond that, their nose had two separate chambers that functioned like ears—they used them to pinpoint the exact location of the smell. Halstead, L. B. 1971. Liopleurodon rossicus (Novozhilov) – a pliosaur from the Lower Volgian of the Moscow Basin. Palaeontology, 14, 566-571.

You may also like

Although the initial fossil discoveries were centered around dinosaurs, other creatures were soon discovered, all of which gave researchers an insight into the prehistoric era. Mounted skeleton of Liopleurodon ferox in the Tübingen Museum, Germany (from Martill and Naish, 2000). There are two determinations for this specimen in the NHM’s data portal. One of the determinations is Liopleurodon ferox but this is an old identification (Hilary Ketchum, personal communication). The most recent determination is attributed to my friend and fellow plesiosaur palaeontologist Dr Hilary Ketchum who regards it more cautiously as an indeterminate pliosaurid (personal communication). [In a previous version of this article I wrongly attributed the Liopeurodon ferox determination to Hilary]. So, there you go, the Newman & Tarlo reconstruction is based on material that was once referred to Liopleurodon ferox, and although the material is too incomplete to be sure, it could be. Ah, if only it were that simple… Geological map of Stewartby showing the position of the Coronation Pit where the ‘Stewartby Pliosaur’ was excavated from the Peterborough Member of the Oxford Clay Formation. Mosasaurs were much bigger and had more powerful jaws than their predecessors, which gave the Liopleurodon real competition. Inanimate objects were not left out; they likely always tried to bite every big thing they discovered.

Their first fossils were recovered in the 19th century, and these items have proved pivotal in knowing more about this apex predator. L. B. Tarlo (who later went by the name of L. B. Halstead) repurposed part of this iconic reconstruction in at least one other publication, captioned as Liopleurodon (Halstead 1982). However, It was apparently Jane Ann Robinson (1975) who first reused the reconstruction under that genus. Robinson (1977) cites a personal communication with Halstead, so they were certainly acquainted with each other by 1977, so it is possible, likely even, that Robinson consulted with Tarlo/Halstead a couple of years earlier when she reused and captioned the reconstruction as Liopleurodon.

Over the years, people have tried to draw or design the Liopleurodon differently, some as a two-dimensional image, others as three-dimensional toys and sculptures. Conclusion Although it’s challenging to get the accurate appearance of the animal with so little evidence of its existence, paleontologists have drawn inspiration from general pliosaur anatomy. We know Halstead attributed the reconstruction to Liopleurodon in 1982 (Halstead 1982), so we can be reasonably confident the reconstruction was based on material regarded by him as Liopleurodon at that time, which would have included the lectotype of ‘ Stretosaurus‘. It would also make sense for Tarlo to use the ‘Stretham Pliosaur’ specimen in the Newman & Tarlo reconstruction for two other reasons. First, he described and was intimately familiar with it (Tarlo, 1957, 1959, 1960), and second, in Tarlo’s words, “The Streatham specimen is one of the most important Pliosaur[sic] skeletons to have come out of the Kimeridge [sic][and]…most of the post-cranial skeleton can be described” (Tarlo 1959, p. 41). And, of course, the specimen certainly fulfils the criterion of “other giant pliosaur remains” as stipulated by Newman and Tarlo. From its physical characteristics to its behavior, diet, and more, it is evident that the Liopleurodon was a formidable animal.

It is a spectacular figure and is by far the most accurate pliosaur toy reviewed on The Dinosaur Toy Blog so far. All of the Walking with Dinosaurs figures are almost perfectly symmetrical, which is a let down in most of the figures which appear to be just ‘standing around’. However, this is not so much of an issue in the aquatic Liopleurodon. The figure is 24cm long.According to sources, the Liopleurodon gave birth to one offspring at a time, and they were likely the size of a baby whale. As the apex predators that they were, Liopleurodon had a wide variety of prey, ranging from ichthyosaurs to marine crocodiles, sharks, and other pliosaurs. Although it is hard to determine the lifespan of this creature, Liopleurodon likely lived quite long, like several reptiles we see today.